Traduction: G.M.
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Jun;62:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
Implementation evaluation of early intensive behavioral intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of studies in the last decade
Author information
- 1
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Département de psychoéducation, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada. Electronic address: valerie.caron1@uqtr.ca
- 2
- Université du Québec en Outaouais, Département de psychoéducation, Pavillon Alexandre Taché, 283 Boulevard Alexandre-Taché, Gatineau, QC J9A 1L8, Canada. Electronic address: annie.berube@uqo.ca
- 3
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Département de psychoéducation, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada. Electronic address: annie.paquet@uqtr.ca
Abstract
Pour
les jeunes enfants avec un diagnostic de trouble du spectre de l'autisme, l'une
des interventions choisies est l'intervention comportementale intensive
précoce. Au
cours des dix dernières années, son efficacité a été largement évaluée
en fonction de divers paramètres, y compris l'intensité et la durée de
l'intervention. Malgré les progrès majeurs dans l'évaluation de l'efficacité, les
données concernant la mise en œuvre de l'intervention sont souvent
décrites brièvement, et les ingrédients actifs de l'intervention sont
rarement liés aux effets documentés.
For young children with autism spectrum disorders, one of the choice interventions is Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. Over the past ten years, its effectiveness has been abundantly evaluated based on various parameters, including the intensity and duration of the intervention. Despite major advances in effectiveness evaluation, data concerning the implementation of the intervention are often described briefly, and the active ingredients of the intervention are but rarely linked to the documented effects.
This study aims at reviewing with a systematic method, the studies pertaining to EIBI provided to children with autism spectrum disorders over the past ten years (2005-2015) and at documenting the program implementation components described in the studies, based on Dane and Schneider's (1998) model in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
The results show that, although the variables related to intervention dosage and protocol are relatively well described, the authors do not always consider them in the effects analysis. Furthermore, the majority of the studies did not report information on intervention participation, differentiation or quality.
Data concerning the implementation of the intervention are partially described in the articles retained. In this regard, a better description of the intervention provided and a more systematic evaluation of its implementation seem necessary to detect the subtle differences in the effects of the intervention.
For young children with autism spectrum disorders, one of the choice interventions is Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. Over the past ten years, its effectiveness has been abundantly evaluated based on various parameters, including the intensity and duration of the intervention. Despite major advances in effectiveness evaluation, data concerning the implementation of the intervention are often described briefly, and the active ingredients of the intervention are but rarely linked to the documented effects.
OBJECTIVES:
L'étude vise à examiner avec une méthode systématique, les études relatives à EIBI fournies aux enfants atteints de troubles du spectre autistique au cours des dix dernières années (2005-2015) et à documenter les composantes de mise en œuvre du programme décrites dans les études, basées sur Dane et Schneider ( 1998) selon les directives PRISMA.This study aims at reviewing with a systematic method, the studies pertaining to EIBI provided to children with autism spectrum disorders over the past ten years (2005-2015) and at documenting the program implementation components described in the studies, based on Dane and Schneider's (1998) model in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS:
Les résultats montrent que, bien que les variables liées à la dose et au protocole d'intervention soient relativement bien décrites, les auteurs ne les considèrent pas toujours dans l'analyse des effets. En outre, la majorité des études n'ont pas révélé d'informations sur la participation, la différenciation ou la qualité de l'intervention.The results show that, although the variables related to intervention dosage and protocol are relatively well described, the authors do not always consider them in the effects analysis. Furthermore, the majority of the studies did not report information on intervention participation, differentiation or quality.
CONCLUSIONS:
Les données concernant la mise en œuvre de l'intervention sont partiellement décrites dans les articles retenus. À cet égard, une meilleure description de l'intervention fournie et une évaluation plus systématique de sa mise en œuvre semblent nécessaires pour détecter les différences subtiles dans les effets de l'interventionData concerning the implementation of the intervention are partially described in the articles retained. In this regard, a better description of the intervention provided and a more systematic evaluation of its implementation seem necessary to detect the subtle differences in the effects of the intervention.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- PMID: 28189054
- DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.004
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire